Why PhDs fail.
Dropping out is rarely down to a lack of talent. It’s usually down to the same four reasons, and all four can be addressed early on if they’re identified.
PhD programmes typically fail for four reasons: lack of access to data, an unclear or overly broad research question, unreliable supervision, and a timetable that fails to take professional commitments into account. All four can be assessed before you begin. If you do so, in the worst-case scenario you’ll lose weeks rather than years.
The four reasons
A company withdraws authorisation, a hospital changes management, or the response rate remains too low. A Plan B belongs in the design phase, not in a crisis.
Anyone who is still searching for the question after two years doesn’t have a time problem, but a focus problem.
A change of staff, retirement or simply a lack of feedback. A regular routine and early alternative supervision provide protection.
Without buffers and fixed time slots, work gets pushed aside by day-to-day tasks until it disappears.
The warning signs
Three early signs indicate that something is going wrong: you’re avoiding discussions with your supervisor. You’ve been working on peripheral tasks for weeks instead of the core work. You can no longer explain your question in two sentences.
Each of these signs can be rectified if you speak up about them. Keeping them to yourself leads to the project being abandoned – usually only after a further twelve months in which nothing gets done.
What helps at each stage
The remedies are unspectacular but effective:
When discontinuing the project is the right decision
If a key prerequisite is permanently lost – such as access to data – and no viable alternative can be found, it is better to cut your losses early. The same applies if your life circumstances have changed fundamentally and there is no longer any room for the work over the coming years.
Withdrawing is not a defeat if it is based on a reassessment rather than exhaustion. And in many cases, a leave of absence in accordance with the doctoral regulations is the better alternative.
What we do about it
We make progress visible and identify early on when a plan is no longer viable. This is uncomfortable, and it is precisely why support is valuable in the first place: a project that is adjusted after six months is likely to succeed. One that would need to be adjusted after three years usually does not.
Further enquiries.
How many PhD programmes are discontinued?+
It is difficult to provide reliable overall figures because drop-outs are rarely recorded systematically. For those in employment, the reasons are known and can be addressed, regardless of the rate.
What is the most common reason?+
In our experience, it is access to data, closely followed by a research question that is too broad.
Can I carry on after a break?+
Generally, yes. The regulations cover interruptions and re-enrolment. In practice, getting back into the programme takes time, so make sure to factor this in.
What should I do if my supervisor doesn’t respond?+
First, follow up in writing with a specific request and a deadline; then involve the secondary supervisor; then contact the relevant department within the faculty.
When is dropping out the right decision?+
If the key prerequisite is permanently no longer met and no alternative can be found. In that case, it’s better to cut your losses early.
Does support help prevent students from dropping out?+
It helps if it provides early intervention: making progress visible, adjusting plans, and addressing problems whilst they are still minor.
Related.
Free initial consultation, with no obligation.
15 minutes online: We’ll discuss your current situation, a possible topic and the best way forward.
Please fill in your contact details in the form. We’ll call you back and sort out all the details during the call.