Ascendius Free initial consultation
For whom
Management & Economics Lawyers Healthcare & Social Services Engineering & Technology You have (only) a bachelor’s degree A new impetus (plateau) Visibility in the AI age
About
The 4 Phases Integrity FAQ Free initial consultation →
For working professionals Personal contribution Structure rather than boilerplate text
Exposé

The exposé in the field of economics.

Two things are assessed here: whether your question is grounded in theory and whether the data you need is actually accessible. Both are determined before the first line of body text is written.

Free initial consultation → 15 mins · no obligation
The short answer

The research proposal outlines the research gap, theoretical framework, research question, model or hypotheses, data basis, methodology, expected contribution and timeline. For working professionals, access to data is the critical issue: without a reliable, written commitment, even the best design remains merely a draft.

The components

The length is usually between 8 and 15 pages, depending on the supervisor’s requirements.

Relevance and research gap, substantiated by the current literature.
Theoretical framework: the perspective from which you examine the subject.
Research question and, where appropriate, hypotheses with expected correlations.
Data basis: primary data collection, secondary data or company data, with proof of access.
Methodology: procedures, identification strategy, handling of endogeneity and biases.
Expected contribution: what will be known differently as a result of the work, both theoretically and practically.
Time and work plan, including buffers for data collection and approvals.

The theoretical framework underpins the work

In economics, the framework determines which variables are relevant and how results are interpreted. Anyone who collects data without a framework produces data without interpretation, and this is precisely what stands out during the peer review process.

The framework does not need to be new. It must be appropriate, clearly referenced and demonstrate where your work extends, tests or applies it to a new context.

Establishing the practical relevance correctly

A topic drawn from your own organisation is an advantage, provided the question extends beyond the specific case. Therefore, do not simply describe your department’s problem, but rather the general question underlying it, and demonstrate why the answer also applies to other organisations.

Set out in writing which data you are permitted to use and what may be published. This authorisation should be attached to the proposal as an appendix. It answers the first query from any supervisor before it is even asked.

Common weaknesses

No framework
“Data without theory”

Without a theoretical framework, results remain descriptive and difficult to interpret. This is the most common reason for rejection.

Too many questions
“Five hypotheses, no focus”

A main question with a few sub-questions is more effective than a list that cannot be worked through at any stage.

Unclear data
“It’ll sort itself out”

The most common point of failure. Accessibility issues belong before the design phase, not during the data collection phase.

Method as window dressing
“Methodology without justification”

The choice of method must follow from the question. A regression model that identifies nothing will convince no one.

Frequently asked questions

Follow-up questions.

Quantitative or qualitative?+

Whatever the question requires. Both approaches are accepted, as are mixed designs. Check what is standard practice at your target faculty.

Can I use company data?+

Yes, provided you have written authorisation for use and publication. Without this consent, the study is not robust.

How much literature should be included in the synopsis?+

The key works, not everything you’ve read. The aim is to provide an overview, not to be exhaustive.

Does the thesis topic have to be finalised yet?+

The intended contribution, yes; the result, no. You describe what will be known differently as a result of the work.

How long should it be?+

Usually 8 to 15 pages, depending on your supervisor’s guidelines.

Do I need hypotheses?+

For quantitative designs, usually yes. Qualitative studies, on the other hand, formulate guiding questions.

Your next step

Free initial consultation, with no obligation.

15 minutes online: We’ll discuss your current situation, a potential topic and the best way forward.

Please fill in your contact details in the form. We’ll call you back and sort out all the details during the call.

GDPR-compliant data processing
EU AI Act: AI use in compliance with regulations

We’ll get back to you within 24 hours. Data protection.